Anthony A Dixon v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 12 . The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mp)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Anthony A. Dixon
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
ANTHONY A. DIXON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
17
) Case No.: CV 11-9646 AGR
)
) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear
its own fees, costs, and expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: May 16, 2012
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
-1-
1
2
3
4
DATE: May 16, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
BY: __________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney for plaintiff Anthony A. Dixon
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
FOR CASE NUMBER CV 11-9646 AGR
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on May 16, 2012.
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
_______________________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorneys for Plaintiff
___________
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
