Joseph R Francis v. Wynn Las Vegas LLC et al
Filing
46
ORDER STAYING CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The instant action is stayed in its entirety during the pendency of Defendants appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 2. Defendants motion to dismiss individual defendants Stephen A. Wynn and Barbara Conway, filed April 30, 2012, and scheduled for hearing on June 4, 2012, shall be taken off the Courts calendar, and no opposition or reply shall be due, if at all, during the pendency of the above-referenced appeal. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (shb)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH R. FRANCIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, STEPHEN
A. WYNN, and BARBARA CONWAY,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
CASE NO.: CV 11-9054-DSF
Hon. Dale S. Fischer
ORDER STAYING ACTION
PENDING APPEAL
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
6
7
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties filed on May 11,
2012, in the above captioned matter, wherein the Parties agreed that this action should
be stayed during the pendency of Defendants’ appeal of this Court’s order denying
Defendants’ “Motion to Strike Amended Complaint Pursuant to California’s AntiSLAPP Statute” (Docket No. 36), and finding good cause thereon, hereby ORDERS:
1.
8
9
Defendants’ appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
2.
10
11
12
13
The instant action is stayed in its entirety during the pendency of
Defendants’ motion to dismiss individual defendants Stephen A.
Wynn and Barbara Conway, filed April 30, 2012, and scheduled for hearing on June
4, 2012, shall be taken off the Court’s calendar, and no opposition or reply shall be
due, if at all, during the pendency of the above-referenced appeal.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED:
5/17/12
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED:
By:
DALE S. FISCHER
JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
