Mohamed Riched v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 21

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 20 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear St., Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 MOHAMED RICHED 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 19 20 Defendant. 21 22 ) No. CV 11-7374-FMO ) ) [PROPOSED] ) ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand 23 Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment 24 (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within 25 Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 26 DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of 27 Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 28 DATED: 5/8/12 /s/ HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?