Mohamed Riched v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
21
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 20 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8956
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
MOHAMED RICHED
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
19
20
Defendant.
21
22
) No. CV 11-7374-FMO
)
) [PROPOSED]
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
23
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
24
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within
25
Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
26
DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of
27
Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
28
DATED:
5/8/12
/s/
HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?