Steven Rhone v. Domingo Uribe Jr, No. 2:2011cv07031 - Document 54 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford for Report and Recommendation 42 . IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) petitioner's requests for an evidentiary hearing, further development of the record, and the appointment of counsel are denied; and (2) Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (rla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Steven Rhone v. Domingo Uribe Jr Doc. 54 0 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS SERVED FiflST CLASS MAIL. POSTAGE PREPAID, TO H7lii10Y\b(' {Ofl PAilTIES) AT THEIR RESPECTIVE MOST RECENT ADDRESS OF RlCORD IN THIS ACTION ON THIS DATE. 4 omo, 2 5 FILED CLERK, U.S.D.C. SOUTHERN DIVISION JAN-4 2013 DEPUTY CLERK OF CALIFORNIA DEPUTY 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 STEVEN RHONE, Petitioner, 12 13 14 Case No. CV 11-7031-AG (RNB) vs. DOMINGO URIBE JR., Warden, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 17 records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 18 Magistrate Judge. ' The Court also has reviewed the Supplemental Report and 19 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has 20 engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation 21 and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation to which objections have been 22 made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations ofthe Magistrate Judge. 23 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) petitioner's requests for an 24 evidentiary hearing, further development of the record, and the appointment of 25 counsel are denied; and (2) Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing 26 this action with prejudice. 27 DATED: Pc:.c 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
