Efat Abdollahi v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Filing
16
JUDGMENT: Defendant Wells Fargo is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Plaintiff Efat Abdollahi as Trustee for Efat Abdollahi Living Trustshall take nothing from defendant Wells Fargo. As the prevailing party, defendant Wells Fargo may submit motions to tax costs and to recover reasonable attorneys fees. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
CLOSED
EFAT ABDOLLAHI as Trustee for
EFAT ABDOLLAHI LIVING TRUST,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB;
DOES 1 TO 50, Inclusive,
CASE NO. CV 11-06511 DDP (JCx)
[Assigned to the Honorable Dean D.
Pregerson, District Judge, Courtroom 3]
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.
Defendants.
On September 19, 2011, this Court entered an Order granting the motion of
defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo
Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank,
FSB (erroneously sued as WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER WITH WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB) (“Wells Fargo”) to dismiss the
Complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In
accordance with that Order:
95451/000967/00232957-1
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-06511-DDP-JC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1.
Defendant Wells Fargo is dismissed from this action with prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff Efat Abdollahi as Trustee for Efat Abdollahi Living Trust
shall take nothing from defendant Wells Fargo.
3.
As the prevailing party, defendant Wells Fargo may submit motions to
tax costs and to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 21, 2011
HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
95451/000967/00232957-1
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-06511-DDP-JC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
