Eddie L Cressy v. OM Financial Life Insurance Company et al, No. 2:2011cv05871 - Document 149 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's RICO causes of action are dismissed with prejudice. The Court makes no ruling or judgment on Plaintiff's state law causes of action, declines to exercise supp lemental jurisdiction over these causes of action, and dismisses the state law causes of action without prejudice to their being re-filed in state court. The Court stays the effect of this judgment and of its May 9, 2013 order until the earlier of the re-filing of this action in state court or 60 days from the entry of the May 9, 2013 order. All other pending motions are denied as moot. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Eddie L Cressy v. OM Financial Life Insurance Company et al Doc. 149 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) CASE NO.: LA CV11-5871-JAK (JCx) ) Plaintiff, ) Hon. John A. Kronstadt ) v. ) ) OM FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE ) FINAL JUDGMENT JS-6 ) COMPANY; OGAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.; PARAMOUNT ) ) FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; ) DOUGLAS ANDREW; and ) KENNETH R. OGAN, JR.; ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) EDDIE L. CRESSY, 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 This action came on for hearing before the Court on Defendants’ motions to 2 dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 117, 118), Defendants’ motions for 3 review of Magistrate Judge Choolijian’s order denying a stay of discovery (Dkt. 80, 4 82), and Defendants’ motions to strike Plaintiff’s notice of intervening authority (Dkt. 5 140, 141). 6 Pursuant to the Court order of May 8, 2013 (Dkt. 143) granting the motions to 7 dismiss in part, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s RICO causes of action 8 are dismissed with prejudice. The Court makes no ruling or judgment on Plaintiff’s 9 state law causes of action, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over these 10 causes of action, and dismisses the state law causes of action without prejudice to their 11 being re-filed in state court. The Court stays the effect of this judgment and of its 12 May 9, 2013 order until the earlier of the re-filing of this action in state court or 60 13 days from the entry of the May 9, 2013 order. All other pending motions are denied 14 as moot. 15 16 17 Dated: June 4, 2013 The Honorable John A. Kronstadt United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
