Nicolas Gonzalez v. Southern Wine and Spirits of America Inc et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES' FIRST AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 17 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. **See Order for details.** (ch)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Clement J. Kong, Esq. (State Bar No. 69084)
Email: Clement@kkks.com
T.R. Sugano, Esq. (State Bar No. 54654)
Email: TRS@kkks.com
Keith R. Thorell, Esq. (State Bar No. 199558)
Email: Keith@kkks.com
Lauren F. Hager, Esq. (State Bar No. 256003)
Email: LaurenH@kkks.com
KORSHAK, KRACOFF, KONG & SUGANO, LLP
1640 So. Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 520
Los Angeles, California 90025
Tel. 310-996-2340; Fax 310-996-2334
9
Attorneys for Defendant
10 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS OF AMERICA, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
Case No. CV 11-5849-ODW (PLAx)
17
ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES’
FIRST AMENDED STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
NICOLAS GONZALEZ, individually
16 and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
18
19
v.
20 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF
21
22
AMERICA, INC.,
Hon. Otis D. Wright II, presiding
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING FIRST AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
ORDER
2
The Court, having received, reviewed and considered the Parties’ First
3 Amended Stipulated Protective Order, and upon a finding that good cause exists,
4 hereby ORDERS that the Parties’ First Amended Stipulated Protective Order shall
5 govern the disclosure of information in this action.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated: September 22, 2011
8
9
10
THE HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS
United States Magistrate Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING FIRST AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
