Renato Cuenca v. Emcor Government Services et al
Filing
26
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, Having considered the Stipulation Regarding Protective Order Regarding Confidential Documents submitted jointly by plaintiffs Renato Cuenca and James Scott Jorgenson and defendant Emcor Government Services, Inc., and good cause appearing therefor, this Court hereby ENTERS the protective order attached to this Order as Exhibit A. re Stipulation for Protective Order 25 (lmh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RENATO CUENCA, an individual,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
EMCOR GOVERNMENT
SERVICES, a business form unknown;
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
13
14
15
Case No. CV 11-05102-CAS (JEMx)
[Assigned to the Hon. Christina A.
Snyder]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL
DOCUMENTS
Defendants.
16
JAMES SCOTT JORGENSON, an
individual,
17
v.
18
EMCOR GOVERNMENT
SERVICES, a business form unknown;
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
19
20
Case No. CV 11-06548-CAS (JEMx)
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA01/ 1123330.1
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL
DOCUMENTS
1
Having considered the Stipulation Regarding Protective Order Regarding
2
Confidential Documents submitted jointly by plaintiffs Renato Cuenca and James
3
Scott Jorgenson and defendant Emcor Government Services, Inc., and good cause
4
appearing therefor, this Court hereby ENTERS the protective order attached to this
5
Order as Exhibit “A.”
6
7
Dated: May 15, 2012
8
/s/John E. McDermott________________
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1LA01/ 1123330.1
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL
DOCUMENTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?