Ira Bloom v. Harley Lappin et al
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym:, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/3/2011.) [SEE MINUTES FOR DETAILS]. (kca)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 11-4391-MMM (SP)
Title
Ira Bloom v. Harley Lappin, et al.
Present: The Honorable
Date
September 12, 2011
Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge
Kimberly Carter
None Appearing
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing
None Appearing
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
On July 8, 2011, plaintiff Ira Bloom, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed
a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2011, the court sua
sponte screened the complaint, and found several deficiencies in the pleading. See July
28, 2011 Ord. at 5-9. Accordingly, the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice,
but granted plaintiff thirty (30) days leave to amend up to and including August 29,
2011. Id. at 9. As of today’s date, two weeks later, plaintiff has yet to file a First
Amended Complaint.
Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, by October 3,
2011, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action, or
portions thereof, should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a
court order. If plaintiff files his First Amended Complaint on or by October 3, 2011, he
need not separately respond to this Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is cautioned that his
failure to timely file a response to this Order to Show Cause may be deemed by the court
as consent to the dismissal of this action with prejudice.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
