Raymond Wright v. Sheriffs Deputy Gutterrez et al
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 24 and Order. 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted. 2. With the exception of Plaintiffs individual liability claims of retaliation, cruel and unusual punishment and due process against deputy Gutierrez, Plaintiffs claims against all defendants are dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action in this Court, he must file a first amended complaint within thirty days of the date this Order Adopting the Amended Report and Recommendation is filed. (sbu)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15 RAYMOND WRIGHT,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
) CV 11-4343-PSG (SH)
)
) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
Plaintiff,
) RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; and
v.
) ORDER
)
SHERIFF’S DEPUTY GUTIERREZ, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the
Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the
Report and Recommendation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.
2.
With the exception of Plaintiff’s individual liability claims of
1
1
retaliation, cruel and unusual punishment and due process against
2
deputy Gutierrez, Plaintiff’s claims against all defendants are
3
dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim pursuant to
4
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
5
If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action in this Court, he must file a first
6 amended complaint within thirty days of the date this Order Adopting the Amended
7 Report and Recommendation is filed. The amended complaint, bearing the number
8 CV 11-4343-PSG (SH), must be a complete and independent document and must
9 not refer to prior pleadings. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file a first amended
10 complaint within the time specified by this Order may result in dismissal of the
11 action with prejudice on the grounds stated in the Report and Recommendation of
12 the United States Magistrate Judge and/or for failure to prosecute.
13
In preparing a first amended complaint, plaintiff must bear in mind the
14 deficiencies of the current pleading, and must assure that they are not repeated.
15 Plaintiff must take particular note of the following guidelines:
16
1.
17
18
Plaintiff must set forth the jurisdictional grounds for his claims at the
outset of the complaint.
2.
The complaint must include only factual allegations directly relevant
19
to plaintiff's claims, which must be stated in separate, numbered
20
paragraphs (preferably in chronological order), each limited to a single
21
set of circumstances. The facts should be stated in simple, complete
22
sentences. Repetition is to be avoided.
23
3.
The complaint must clearly identify the specific acts on which each
24
claim is based. Insofar as possible, the allegations should include the
25
date, time, place and circumstances of the offending conduct by each
26
defendant, a clear statement of what each defendant did or failed to do,
27
and the damage of injury suffered by plaintiff as a result of each
28
defendant's conduct.
2
1
4.
If civil rights violations are claimed, the complaint must specifically
2
set forth the federal constitutional right or rights infringed with respect
3
to each alleged wrongful act or omission.
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy of
6 this Order on the Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.
7
8 DATED: ____May 3, 2012_________________
9
10
11
12
__________________________________
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?