Bernard Sherman v. Sofen Enterprises Inc et al

Filing 25

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 24 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), with each party to bear its own fees and costs of suit. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Paul D. Rubenstein, Esq. (SBN: 48584) Sarah J. Robertson, Esq. (SBN: 243364) PAUL D. RUBENSTEIN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1370 Los Angeles, California 90067 Phone: 310.586.3209 Fax: 310.586.3233 JS-6 Email: pdr@prubensteinlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, BERNARD SHERMAN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARD SHERMAN, 12 Case No. CV11-04051 DMG (JCGx) Plaintiff, 13 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [24] v. 14 SOFEN ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation; IRVING A. 15 SOFEN, as an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, 16 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 In accordance with the Parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 2 this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of 3 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), with each party to bear its own fees and costs of suit. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 DATED: May 30, 2012 _______________________ DOLLY M. GEE United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?