Bernard Sherman v. Sofen Enterprises Inc et al
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 24 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), with each party to bear its own fees and costs of suit. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Paul D. Rubenstein, Esq. (SBN: 48584)
Sarah J. Robertson, Esq. (SBN: 243364)
PAUL D. RUBENSTEIN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
2029 Century Park East, Suite 1370
Los Angeles, California 90067
Phone: 310.586.3209
Fax: 310.586.3233
JS-6
Email: pdr@prubensteinlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff, BERNARD SHERMAN
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 BERNARD SHERMAN,
12
Case No. CV11-04051 DMG (JCGx)
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE [24]
v.
14 SOFEN ENTERPRISES, INC., a
California corporation; IRVING A.
15 SOFEN, as an individual; and DOES 1
through 10,
16
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
In accordance with the Parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
2
this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of
3
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), with each party to bear its own fees and costs of suit.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
DATED: May 30, 2012
_______________________
DOLLY M. GEE
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?