Chanel, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Association et al
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Gary A. Feess: Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (rrey)
<![CDATA[
LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 11-03780-GAF (PJWx)
Title
Chanel, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Association et al
Present: The Honorable
Date
September 30, 2011
GARY ALLEN FEESS
Renee Fisher
Deputy Clerk
None
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
(In Chambers)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack
of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to
dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:
:
Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request
entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this
order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC
will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
