-JEM Anita Cagle v. Anti-Aging Essentials Inc et al, No. 2:2011cv02940 - Document 43 (C.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz: In accordance with the Court's 6/4/2012, Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Settlement of Class Claims Against All Defendants 37 , the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES as follows: a. Pu rsuant to the Approval Order, this action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice; b. As specified in the Approval Order, the Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of implementation of the Approval Order. c. Except as otherwise provided for in the Approval Order, the parties are each responsible for their own costs; and d. This is a Final Judgment disposing of all claims asserted by or against allparties. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-JEM Anita Cagle v. Anti-Aging Essentials Inc et al Doc. 43 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANITA CAGLE, individually and on behalf of the class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. ANTI-AGING ESSENTIALS, INC.; GENERAL NUTRITION CENTERS, INC.; MARKELL D. BOULIS; ANGEL BOULIS; BELMONT CONFECTIONS, INC.; and DOES 1-300, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV11-02940 AHM (JEMx) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court’s June 4, 2012, Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Settlement of Class Claims Against All Defendants (the “Approval Order”), the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES as follows: a. Pursuant to the Approval Order, this action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice; b. As specified in the Approval Order, the Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of implementation of the Approval Order. -1- Dockets.Justia.com c. Except as otherwise provided for in the Approval Order, the parties are each responsible for their own costs; and d. This is a Final Judgment disposing of all claims asserted by or against all parties. Dated: June 13, 2012 Honorable A. Howard Matz UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JS-6 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
