-AJW Coach Inc et al v. JDL Trading Inc et al, No. 2:2011cv02730 - Document 23 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 22 , ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants JDL Trading, Inc., Shujun Lin, and Jin De Lin and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach Marks, etc. Defenda nts shall pay to Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. an amount in settlement of Plaintiffs' demand for damages, profits, costs, disbursements, and attorneys' fees based upon Defendants' alleged infringing activities. Plaintiffs and Defendants shall bear their own costs associated with this action. See document for details. (gk)

Download PDF
-AJW Coach Inc et al v. JDL Trading Inc et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 23 Brent H. Blakely (SBN 157292) bblakely@blakelylawgroup.com Cindy Chan (SBN 247495) cchan@blakelylawgroup.com BLAKELY LAW GROUP 915 North Citrus Avenue Hollywood, California 90038 Telephone: (323) 464-7400 Facsimile: (323) 464-7410 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 COACH, INC., a Maryland Corporation; ) CASE NO. CV 11-2730 CAS(AJWx) COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT Corporation, ) JUDGMENT INCLUDING A ) PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND Plaintiffs, ) VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF vs. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ) JDL TRADING, INC., a California ) Corporation; SHUJUN LIN, an ) individual; JIN DE LIN, an individual; ) ) and DOES 1-10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) 19 WHEREAS Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. (“Coach”) and 20 Defendants JDL Trading, Inc., Shujun Lin, and Jin De Lin (collectively “Defendants”) 21 have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to the claims in the 22 above referenced matter. Defendants, having agreed to consent to the below terms, it 23 is hereby: 24 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as among the parties hereto that: 25 1. 26 27 28 This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Final Judgment and has jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121. 2. Coach is the worldwide owner of the trademark “COACH” and various composite trademarks and assorted design components (collectively “Coach Marks”). 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Dockets.Justia.com 1 Amongst the many Coach Marks, one of the most well-known and recognized marks is 2 Coach’s Signature “C” Mark (see below). Coach has used the Signature “C” Mark in 3 association with the sale of goods since as early as 2001. The Signature “C” Mark was 4 first registered at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on September 24, 2002. 5 Registrations for the Signature “C” Mark include, but are not limited to, U.S. Reg. 6 Nos. 2,832,589; 3,695,290; and 2,534,429 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3. Plaintiffs have alleged that Defendants’ importation, distribution, advertisement, offering for sale, and sale of products which infringe upon Coach’s Signature “C” Mark constitute trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et. seq. and under the common law. 4. Defendants and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach Marks, include either directly or contributorily, in any manner, including generally, but not limited to manufacturing, importing, distributing, advertising, selling and/or offering for sale any unauthorized product bearing the Signature “C” Mark, or marks confusingly similar or substantially similar to Coach’s Signature “C” Mark, and, specifically from: (a) Using Coach’s Signature “C” Mark or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation thereof in connection with the manufacture, importation, distribution, advertisement, offer for sale and/or sale of merchandise comprising not the genuine products of Coach, or in any manner likely to cause others to believe that Defendants’ products are connected with Coach or Coach’s genuine merchandise; 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 1 (b) Passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any 2 products or other items that are not Coach’s genuine merchandise as and for Coach’s 3 genuine merchandise; 4 (c) Leasing space to any tenant who is engaged in the manufacturing, 5 purchasing, production, distribution, circulation, sale, offering for sale, importation, 6 exportation, advertisement, promotion, display, shipping, marketing of Infringing 7 Products; 8 9 (d) Committing any other acts calculated to cause purchasers to believe that Defendants’ products are Coach’s genuine merchandise unless they are such; 10 (e) Shipping, delivering, holding for sale, distributing, returning, 11 transferring or otherwise moving, storing or disposing of in any manner items falsely 12 bearing the Coach Marks, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation 13 thereof; and 14 (f) Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or 15 entity in performing any of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs 4(a) to 16 4(e) above. 17 5. Without any admission of liability, the parties have agreed that 18 Defendants shall pay to Plaintiffs an amount in settlement of Plaintiffs’ demand for 19 damages, profits, costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees based upon Defendants’ 20 alleged infringing activities. Plaintiffs and Defendants shall bear their own costs 21 associated with this action. 22 6. The execution of this Final Judgment shall serve to bind and obligate the 23 parties hereto. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 1 7. The jurisdiction of this Court is retained for the purpose of making any 2 further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this Final 3 Judgment, the enforcement thereof and the punishment of any violations thereof. 4 Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: September 22, 2011 By: 9 __________________________ Hon. Christina A. Snyder United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.