Michael Fairservice v. Wilshire Bancorp Inc et al, No. 2:2011cv02645 - Document 63 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all of the claims in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for the reasons set forth in the Courts (1) February 8, 2012 Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss (Docket Nos. 35, 38); Denying Motion To Strike As Moot (Docket No. 33); and (2) March 5, 2012 Order Dismissing Action. Plaintiff shall take nothing and the action is dismissed on the merits. (kbr)

Download PDF
Michael Fairservice v. Wilshire Bancorp Inc et al Doc. 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 MICHAEL FAIRSERVICE, 15 Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 v. 19 WILSHIRE BANCORP, INC., 20 JOANNE KIM, AND ALEX KO, 21 Defendants. 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to: Valerie Baker Fairbank Case No. CV11-2645 VBF (PJW) CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT 23 24 25 26 27 28 //// /// /// FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 This action was brought by plaintiff Michael Fairservice (“Plaintiff”) 3 against defendants Wilshire Bancorp, Inc., Joanne Kim, and Alex Ko (“Defendants”). 4 The operative pleading is Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on August 30, 5 2011. 6 7 8 IT IS NOW ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against 9 Plaintiff on all of the claims in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for the reasons 10 set forth in the Court’s (1) February 8, 2012 Order Granting Defendants’ Motions To 11 Dismiss (Docket Nos. 35, 38); Denying Motion To Strike As Moot (Docket No. 33); 12 and (2) March 5, 2012 Order Dismissing Action. Plaintiff shall take nothing and the 13 action is dismissed on the merits. 14 15 THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO ENTER THIS JUDGMENT FORTHWITH. 16 17 18 19 Dated: 6/22/12 Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.