-RNB Richard Poirier v. City of North Hollywood et al, No. 2:2011cv02030 - Document 19 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation 18 : IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) plaintiffs 1981 claims, state law claims, 1983 malicious prosecution claim, 1983 First Amendment claim, 1983 cla ims against defendants Collins and John Doe, and 1983 claims against the three named entity defendants are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) if plaintiff still desires to pursue this action, he is ordered to file within twenty-eight (28) days a Third Amended Complaint limited to his § 1983 Fourth Amendment claims against defendants Vasquez and Ocehoa in their individual capacities. Plaintiff is admonished that, if he fails to timely file a Third Amended Complaint limited to his 1983 Fourth Amended claims against defendants Vasquez and Ocehoa in their individual capacities, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a Court order. (rla)

Download PDF
-RNB Richard Poirier v. City of North Hollywood et al Doc. 19 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.