Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc. v. Ross Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
53
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ROSS STORES, INC.; UNO CLOTHING, INC.; CREWKNITWEAR, INC.; INBS, INC.; U.S. TEXTILE PRINTING INC.; AND MCKENZIE AND OKRA INC. 52 by Judge George H Wu. See order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jre)
<![CDATA[
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
VOLUMECOCOMO APPAREL,
INC., a California corporation,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
vs.
ROSS STORES, INC., a Delaware
corporation; UNO CLOTHING, INC.,
a California corporation; CREW
KNITWEAR, INC., a California
corporation; INBS, INC., a New York
corporation; JADE TEXTILE, INC., a
California corporation; U.S.
TEXTILE PRINTING INC., a
California corporation; MCKENZIE
& OKRA INC., a California
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
23
Case No. CV 11-01773 GW (PHWx)
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL OF ROSS STORES,
INC.; UNO CLOTHING, INC.; CREW
KNITWEAR, INC.; INBS, INC.; U.S.
TEXTILE PRINTING INC.; AND
MCKENZIE AND OKRA INC.
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
125624.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff VolumeCocomo Apparel, Inc. and
2
Defendants Ross Stores, Inc.; Uno Clothing, Inc.; Crew Knitwear, Inc.; INBS, Inc.;
3
U.S. Textile Printing Inc.; and McKenzie & Okra Inc., the Court orders that:
4
1.
Ross Stores, Inc.;
5
2.
Uno Clothing, Inc.;
6
3.
Crew Knitwear, Inc.;
7
4.
INBS, Inc.;
8
5.
U.S. Textile Printing Inc.; and
9
6.
McKenzie & Okra Inc.;
10 be dismissed from the above-captioned action, with prejudice. Each party shall
11 bear its own costs, attorneys’ fees and court fees.
12
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15 Dated: May 24 2012
16
______________________________
Hon. George H. Wu
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
125624.1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
