Paramount Petroleum Corporation v. Kerr Contractors, Inc. et al
Filing
41
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A Kronstadt, re GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case #39 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rne)
<![CDATA[
1 Stephen D. Weisskopf, Esq. (State Bar No. 213596)
sweisskopf@tocounsel.com
2 Walter Peña, Esq. (State Bar No. 247469)
wpena@tocounsel.com
3 THEODORA ORINGHER PC
10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1700
4 Los Angeles, California 90024-4101
Telephone: (310) 557-2009
5 Facsimile: (310) 551-0283
JS-6
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff PARAMOUNT
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM
CORPORATION, a Delaware
12 corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15 KERR CONTRACTORS, INC., an
Oregon corporation, and DOES 1
16 through 10, inclusive,
17
18
Defendants.
Case No. CV 11-01752-JAK (FFMx)
Honorable John A. Kronstadt,
Ctrm. 750
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION
Date Action Filed: March 1, 2011
Discovery Cutoff: October 24, 2011
Motion Cutoff:
December 5, 2011
Trial Date:
January 31, 2012
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
857201.1/22163.05002
CV 11-01752-JAK (FFMx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
1
Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal executed by
2 Plaintiff Paramount Petroleum Corporation and Defendant Kerr Contractors, Inc.
3 wherein the parties request that all of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendant’s
4 counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, with each
5 party to bear its own costs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
6
The entire action as to all parties and all claims is dismissed with prejudice,
7 with each party to bear its own costs.
8
9 DATED: September 28, 2011
10
11
______________________________
12
Hon. John A. Kronstadt
13
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
857201.1/22163.05002
CV 11-01752-JAK (FFMx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
