Veronica Gutierrez et al v. Davlyn Investments Inc et al
Filing
25
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H Wu 24 . Having considered the parties joint Stipulation of Entire Action Following Settlement pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), the Court hereby DISMISSES this action. This dismissal shall be with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im)
<![CDATA[
1
MADE JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA –WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
12
13
VERONICA GUTIERREZ, an
individual; CLAUDIA PINEDA, an
individual; STEVEN MUNOZ, an
individual; ANA PORTILLO, an
individual; and FRANCISCO
GARDUNO, an individual,
Case No. CV 11-1365-GW(AJWx)
[Removed from State Court
Case No. BC447659]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
14
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
16
17
18
19
DAVLYN INVESTMENTS, INC., an
Entity duly authorized to do business in
the State of California; DLGP
AVENTINE, LLC., a limited liability
company duly authorized to do business
in the State of California; and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive
20
Defendants.
21
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Irvine 732540.1
1
Having considered the parties’ joint Stipulation of Entire Action Following
2
Settlement pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), the Court
3
hereby DISMISSES this action. This dismissal shall be with prejudice.
4
It is stipulated and agreed by and between the parties through their
5
designated counsel that the Court should retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms
6
and conditions of the settlement agreements between the parties.
7
8
DATED: September 21, 2011
___________________________
JUDGE GEORGE H. WU
United States District Court,
Presiding
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Irvine 732540.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Irvine 732540.1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
