-JC Securities and Exchange Commison v. Michael W Perry et al, No. 2:2011cv01309 - Document 91 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT A. SCOTT KEYS by Judge Manuel L. Real, in favor of A. Scott Keys. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Clerk shall enter Final Judgment of Dismissal in favor of A. SCOTT KEYS as to all claimsasserted by Plaintiff U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission in this matter. 74 (pj)

Download PDF
-JC Securities and Exchange Commison v. Michael W Perry et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Doc. 91 WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP Gregory S. Bruch (admitted pro hac vice) gbruch@willkie.com Julie A. Smith (CA Bar #147178) jasmith@willkie.com Jessica L. Matelis (admitted pro hac vice) jmatelis@willkie.com Katherine D. Hanniford (admitted pro hac vice) khanniford@willkie.com 1875 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: 202-303-1000 Fax: 202-303-2000 Attorneys for Defendant A. Scott Keys 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISION AT LOS ANGELES 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL W. PERRY and A. SCOTT KEYS Defendants. Case No. CV-11-01309-R ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT A. SCOTT KEYS Courtroom: Judge: 8 Hon. Manuel L. Real 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV-11-01309-R Dockets.Justia.com 2164233.2 1 Pursuant to this Court’s ruling of May 21, 2012, and this Court’s Order and 2 Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law entered on May 31, 2012 granting 3 summary judgment to A. SCOTT KEYS and MICHAEL W. PERRY, which disposed 4 of all of the claims of Plaintiff U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission against A. 5 Scott Keys; 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Clerk shall 7 enter Final Judgment of Dismissal in favor of A. SCOTT KEYS as to all claims 8 asserted by Plaintiff U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission in this matter. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. 10 11 DATED: May 31, 2012 By: 12 Hon. Manuel L. Real 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV-11-01309-R -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.