Jane Foerster v. Patenthealth LLC et al
Filing
39
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order 37 . [See Order for details.] (san)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JANE FOERSTER, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
PATENTHEALTH, LLC, an Ohio
corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Case No. CV10 9936 AHM (JEMx)
[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL
PROTECTIVE ORER
Judge: Hon. John E. McDermott
Place: Courtroom C, 8th Floor
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
Upon consideration of the Stipulation re: Supplemental Protective Order, filed
3
on September 20, 2011 by Plaintiff Jane Foerster ("Plaintiff") and Defendant
4
PatentHEALTH, LLC ("Defendant") (together the "Parties," and each individually, a
5
"Party"), the Court GRANTS the Supplemental Protective Order as follows:
6
1.
The Supplemental Protective Order shall govern all CONFIDENTIAL
7
FINANCIAL INFORMATION produced or disclosed in the Litigation by Defendant
8
to Plaintiff's Counsel of Record.
9
2.
The term "CONFIDENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION" shall
10
mean and include non-public confidential information of or in the possession of the
11
Defendant that Defendant may disclose to Plaintiff's Counsel of Record in connection
12
with any settlement discussion and as to which Defendant considers in good faith to
13
contain financial information that may be protected from public disclosure under the
14
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or California law.
15
3.
16
persons:
17
The term "Plaintiff's Counsel of Record" shall mean the following
a.
18
Natalie Finkelman Bennett, Esq., of Shepherd Finkleman Miller &
Shah LLP;
19
b.
20
Scott R. Shepherd, Esq., of Shepherd Finkleman Miller & Shah
LLP;
21
c.
James C. Shah, Esq., of Shepherd Finkleman Miller & Shah LLP;
22
d.
Behram V. Parekh, Esq., of Kirtland & Packard LLP;
23
e.
Heather Marie Peterseon, Esq., of Kirtland & Packard LLP; and
24
f.
Michael L. Kelly, Esq., of Kirtland & Packard LLP;
25
26
27
28
4.
Capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same
meanings ascribed to them in the Protective Order.
5.
Any Discovery Materials containing or including any CONFIDENTIAL
FINANCIAL INFORMATION shall be designated as such by Defendant by stamping
-1[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
or labeling it with, or otherwise affixing thereto, the following legend on every page
2
of the Document:
3
4
"CONFIDENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION"
6.
All CONFIDENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION not reduced to
5
documentary or tangible form or which cannot be conveniently designated in the
6
manner set forth above shall be designated by Defendant by informing one or more of
7
Plaintiff's Counsel of Record in writing of the appropriate designation.
8
9
7.
Plaintiff's Counsel of Record may view CONFIDENTIAL FINANCIAL
INFORMATION for the sole purpose of confirming Defendant's current financial
10
condition in order to facilitate the settlement discussions that occur on or before
11
October 18, 2011 between Plaintiff and Defendant.
12
8.
Plaintiff's Counsel of Record shall maintain all CONFIDENTIAL
13
FINANCIAL INFORMATION in the strictest of confidence and, except as expressly
14
provided herein, under no circumstances may CONFIDENTIAL FINANCIAL
15
INFORMATION (i) be used for any purpose by any person, (ii) be disclosed by
16
Plaintiff's Counsel of Record to any person, including Plaintiff, Independent Experts
17
or Consultants, the Court, or to any of Plaintiff's Representatives, or (iii) be copied,
18
photographed, imaged, summarized, distributed, or otherwise referenced.
19
9.
All CONFIDENTIAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION shall be returned
20
to Defendant (i) immediately following termination or conclusion of settlement
21
discussions, or (ii) by close of business on October 18, 2011, whichever is earlier, and
22
Plaintiff's Counsel of Record shall certify in writing that it has done so.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
Dated: September 27, 2011
/s/John E. McDermott
__
HON. JOHN E. MCDERMOTT
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?