TI Beverage Group Ltd v. Vampt Beverage Corp et al
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson GRANTING Stipulation Requesting Dismissal of (1) Plaintiff TI Beverage Ltd's Claims against All Defendants and (2) Defendant Vampt Beverage Corp's Counterclaim against Plaintiff TI Beverage Group Ltd 21 that, TBG's claims asserted in the Complaint against Vampt Beverage, Ian Toews, Jaime Guisto, and Kathy Ratchford are dismissed with prejudice; Vampt Beverage's Counterclaim against TBG is dismissed with prejudice; Each party will each bear her, his, or its own costs and attorneys' fees in connection with this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
<![CDATA[
1
JS-6
2
3
4
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TI BEVERAGE GROUP, LTD.,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
VAMPT BEVERAGE CORP., IAN
TOEWS, JAIME GUISTO, KATHY
RATCHFORD, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV-10-9044 VBF (AJWx)
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
REQUESTING DISMISSAL OF: (1)
PLAINTIFF TI BEVERAGE LTD.’S
CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
AND (2) DEFENDANT VAMPT
BEVERAGE CORP.’S
COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST
PLAINTIFF TI BEVERAGE GROUP
LTD.
Date Action Filed: November 23, 2010
Trial Date: February 6, 2012
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REQUESTING DISMISSAL
53533926v1
1
Whereas Plaintiff and Counter-defendant TI Beverage Group Ltd. (“TBG”), on
2
the one hand, and Defendant and Counterclaimant Vampt Beverage Corp. (“Vampt
3
Beverage”), and Defendants Ian Toews, Jaime Guisto, and Kathy Ratchford, on the
4
other hand, through their respective counsel, have, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 41, stipulated to the dismissal of all claims against each other as set forth
6
in their concurrently filed Stipulation.
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon good cause shown:
8
1.
9
TBG’s claims asserted in the Complaint against Vampt Beverage, Ian
Toews, Jaime Guisto, and Kathy Ratchford are dismissed with prejudice;
10
2.
Vampt Beverage’s Counterclaim against TBG is dismissed with prejudice;
11
3.
Each party will each bear her, his, or its own costs and attorneys’ fees in
12
connection with this action.
13
14
15
Dated: September 7, 2011
16
17
18
_______________________________________
Percy Anderson
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REQUESTING DISMISSAL
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
