Curtis Clark v. Prudential Annuities et al, No. 2:2010cv04954 - Document 20 (C.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED: Judgment as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff shall be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff Curtis Clark; the action of Plaintiff against Defendant is dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his action against Defendant. (bp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Curtis Clark v. Prudential Annuities et al Doc. 20 E-FILED 11/5/2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP L. JULIUS M. TURMAN, State Bar No. 226126 jturman@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.442.1001 MATTHEW S. MENZIE, State Bar No. 211404 mmenzie@morganlewis.com 300 South Grand Ave., 22nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 Tel: 213.612.2500 Fax: 213.612.2501 Attorneys for Defendant Prudential Annuities 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 Case No. CV10-4954-GAF (PJWx) CURTIS CLARK, vs. PRUDENTIAL ANNUITIES, A BUSINESS OF PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC., AND DOES 1 THRU 100, inclusive 18 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ON ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Judge: Hon. Gary A. Feess Defendants. 19 Defendant Prudential Annuities (“Prudential” or “Defendant”) filed a Motion 20 to Dismiss on July 13, 2010. The matter was heard before this Court on September 21 13, 2010. 22 The Court, having considered the parties’ moving, opposing, reply and 23 supplemental papers and the evidentiary record as a whole, concluded that all of 24 Plaintiff’s claims fail for the reasons provided in the Court’s Order. Accordingly, 25 the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on these claims. The Order 26 Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and is 27 hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW HOUSTON DB2/22012472.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ORDER CASE NO. CV10-4954-GAF (PJWX) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED: Judgment as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff shall be entered in favor of 4 Defendant and against Plaintiff Curtis Clark; the action of Plaintiff against 5 Defendant is dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his action 6 against Defendant. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: November 4, 2010 ____________________________________ Hon. Gary A. Feess Judge of the United States District Court Central District 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW HOUSTON DB2/22012472.1 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ORDER CASE NO. CV10-4954-GAF (PJWX)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
