Dora M. Diaz v. Marlene Prada Bautista et al, No. 2:2010cv04690 - Document 59 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT DISMISSING DEFENDANT DINAYRA SERPA by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen, The Court hereby enters final judgment dismissing defendant Dinayra Serpa (bp)

Download PDF
Dora M. Diaz v. Marlene Prada Bautista et al Doc. 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION ) Case No. 2:10-cv-04690-JHN-JCx ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT DISMISSING Plaintiff, ) DEFENDANT DINAYRA SERPA ) v. ) MARLENE PRADA BAUTISTA, as an) individual, and dba FAJATE DISENOS ) ) D'PRADA BAUTISTA; et al., ) ) Defendants. ________________________________ ) ) AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ) ) DORA M. DIAZ, dba FAJATEVIRTUAL SENSUALITY, 22 23 In its October 20, 2010 Order Denying in Part and Granting In Part (Docket No. 24 34), the Court granted the motion of defendant Dinayra Serpa to be dismissed from this 25 action for lack of specific personal jurisdiction. On November 19, 2010, plaintiff and 26 counter-defendant Dora M. Diaz (“Diaz”) filed her Application for Entry of a Final 27 Judgment Dismissing Defendant Dinayra Serpa for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 28 (“Application,” Docket No. 44). On December 23, 2010, the Court granted that Application (Docket No. 56). _____________________________________________________1_______________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT DISMISSING DEFENDANT DINAYRA SERPA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, the Court hereby enters final judgment dismissing defendant Dinayra Serpa. 3 4 5 6 7 Dated January 04, 2011 _______________________________ Jacqueline H. Nguyen United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________2_______________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT DISMISSING DEFENDANT DINAYRA SERPA

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.