Tre Milano, LLC v. Erwin Armijos et al, No. 2:2010cv02857 - Document 14 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff TRE MILANO, LLC is hereby awarded final judgment on its claims for relief against Defendant ERWIN ARMIJOS as the prevailing party in this action, pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local Rule 55-3, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees of $5,600.00, (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

Download PDF
Tre Milano, LLC v. Erwin Armijos et al Doc. 14 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698 E-mail: cjohnson@johnsonpham.com Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697 E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227 E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com 6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 115 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 888-7540 Facsimile: (818) 888-7544 Attorneys for Plaintiff TRE MILANO, LLC 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 Case No.: CV10-02857 GAF (AGRx) TRE MILANO, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, 18 JUDGMENT vs. 19 20 ERWIN ARMIJOS, an Individual, and Does 1-10, Inclusive, 21 22 Defendants. 23 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 25 Plaintiff TRE MILANO, LLC, is hereby awarded final judgment on its 26 claims for relief against Defendant ERWIN ARMIJOS as the prevailing party in 27 this action, pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local Rule 55-3, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ -1JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 fees of $5,600.00. Plaintiff is further awarded costs, pursuant to the Copyright Act, 2 17 U.S.C. §504(c), to be determined by the Notice of Application to the Clerk to 3 Tax Costs within fifteen (15) days after the entry of judgment. Furthermore, Defendant is permanently enjoined and restrained from the 4 5 following activities and conduct and ordered as follows: 6 a. Defendant is enjoined and 7 manufacturing, advertising, distributing, offering for sale, selling, 8 whether directly or indirectly, counterfeit InStyler® rotating hot irons 9 and any other products of any kind bearing Plaintiff’s marks or names 10 that are confusingly similar to the trademarks, trade names, designs or 11 logos of Plaintiff; 12 b. 13 Plaintiff’s marks or any copy, reproduction, or colorable imitation, or 14 confusingly similar simulation of Plaintiff’s marks on or in connection 15 with the promotion, advertising, distribution, manufacture or sale of 16 Defendant’s goods; 17 c. 18 promotions, advertisements and merchandise bearing Plaintiff’s marks 19 or any confusingly similar simulation to Plaintiff’s marks, which have 20 been published, placed or shipped by Defendant or under Defendant’s 21 authority, to any person, entity, or customer, including, without 22 limitation, any publisher, agency, wholesaler, distributor, retailer, 23 consignor or marketer, and also deliver to each publisher or customer 24 /// 27 from Defendant is ordered to cancel, withdraw and recall all his /// 26 restrained Defendant is enjoined and permanently restrained from using /// 25 permanently // 28 -2JUDGMENT 1 a copy of this Court's order as it relates to said injunctive relief against 2 Defendant. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: August 27, 2010 6 7 8 By: HON. GARY A. FEESS U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.