M. S. v. Corona-Norco Unified School District, No. 2:2010cv02753 - Document 20 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz: On the sole issue presented to this Court as a result of the deferral ruling of the Office of Administrative Hearings of the State of California, Plaintiff, as the prevailing party, is entitled to the recovery of $1,625.00 in attorneys fees attributable to the work of Peter Collison, and to no other amount resulting from paralegal fees. Plaintiff may also recover whatever costs are awarded by the Clerk. Pursuant to this Judgment, the case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
M. S. v. Corona-Norco Unified School District Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 M.S., Case No. CV 10-02753 AHM (FFMx) 12 FINAL JUDGMENT 13 14 15 16 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED ) SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________ ) 17 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 18 19 On the sole issue presented to this Court as a result of the deferral ruling of the 20 Office of Administrative Hearings of the State of California, Plaintiff, as the 21 prevailing party, is entitled to the recovery of $1,625.00 in attorneys' fees attributable 22 to the work of Peter Collison, and to no other amount resulting from paralegal fees. 23 Plaintiff may also recover whatever costs are awarded by the Clerk. Pursuant to this 24 Judgment, the case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: February 24, 2011 27 JS-6 _______________________ A. Howard Matz United States District Judge 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.