Creative Integrated Systems, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. et al, No. 2:2010cv02735 - Document 330 (C.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz. Joint Stipulation of Non-Infringement and Proposed Covenant not to Sue with Respect to the '461 patent 329 is APPROVED, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. (1) Final Judgment with prejudice is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff. By agreement of the Parties, this Final Judgment, as it relates to the '461 patent, shall not be appealable. (2) Final Judgment with prejudice is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff. By agreement of the Parties, this Final Judgment, as it relates to the 461 patent, shall not be appealable. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Creative Integrated Systems, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. et al Doc. 330 1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 CREATIVE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC., 14 FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 10-CV-2735 AHM (VBK) Judge: Hon. A. Howard Matz v. 16 NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.; NINTENDO CO., LTD.; MACRONIX AMERICA, INC.; and MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. 17 Defendants. 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 10-CV-2735 AHM (VBKx) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 Based upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Non-Infringement and Proposed 2 Covenant not to Sue with Respect to U.S. Patent No. 5,812,461 (“the ‘461 patent), and 3 based on the previous “Order Approving Joint Stipulation of Non-Infringement With 4 Respect To U.S. Patent No. 5,241,497 and Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. 5 Patent No. 5,241,497,”said Joint Stipulation of Non-Infringement and Proposed 6 Covenant not to Sue with Respect to the ‘461 patent is APPROVED, and IT IS 7 HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 8 9 10 11 1. Final Judgment with prejudice is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff. By agreement of the Parties, this Final Judgment, as it relates to the 461 patent, shall not be appealable. 2. The issues of, and any motions, petitions, or proceedings related to, the 12 taxation of costs and the potential entitlement to fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Sec. 285 13 or on any other basis, is deferred until 28 days after the conclusion of any appeal of 14 this Final Judgment as it relates to the ‘497 patent. In the event no appeal is taken 15 from this Final Judgment as it relates to the ‘497 patent, any petition or motion for 16 costs and/or fees as relates to either patent shall be filed 28 days after the last day for 17 filing a timely notice of appeal. 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: July 23 , 2012 Honorable A Howard Matz UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 10-CV-2735 AHM (VBKx) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
