Abulghasen Ahmadpour v. Attorney General of the State of California, No. 2:2010cv02342 - Document 50 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee 42 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (san)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Abulghasen Ahmadpour v. Attorney General of the State of California Doc. 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 ABULGHASEN AHMADPOUR, Petitioner, 12 13 v. 14 RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, 15 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 10-2342-DMG (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of 19 the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections and Amended 20 Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report 21 and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and 22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 DATED: January 3, 2013 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
