Coach Services, Inc. v. Min Jung Lee et al, No. 2:2010cv02324 - Document 44 (C.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT MIN JUNG LEE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 43 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defen dant Min Jung Lee and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach Marks , etc. The parties have agreed that Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff Coach Services, Inc. an amount in settlement of Plaintiffs demand for damages, profits, costs, disbursements, and attorneys' fees based upon Defendant's alleged infringing activities. Plaintiff and Defendant shall bear their own costs associated with this action. Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice as to Defendant Min Jung Lee dba Bag Stige. See document for details. (gk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Coach Services, Inc. v. Min Jung Lee et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 44 Brent H. Blakely (SBN 157292) bblakely@blakelylawgroup.com Cindy Chan (SBN 247495) cchan@blakelylawgroup.com BLAKELY LAW GROUP 915 North Citrus Avenue Hollywood, California 90038 Telephone: (323) 464-7400 Facsimile: (323) 464-7410 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 17 COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland ) CASE NO. CV 10-2324 CAS (FFMx) ) Corporation, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ) CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING Plaintiff, ) A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND vs. ) VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO MIN JUNG LEE, an individual dba ) DEFENDANT MIN JUNG LEE BAG STIGE; AZ WORLD, INC., a California Corporation; XUSHENG XU, ) an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants ) 18 WHEREAS Plaintiff Coach Services, Inc. (“Coach”) and Defendant Min Jung 12 13 14 15 16 19 Lee (“Defendant”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to 20 the claims in the above referenced matter. Defendant, having agreed to consent to the 21 below terms, it is hereby: 22 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as among the parties hereto that: 23 1. 24 25 This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Final Judgment and has jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121. 2. Coach is the worldwide owner of the trademark “COACH” and various 26 composite trademarks and assorted design components (“Coach Marks”). Amongst 27 the many Coach Marks, one of the most well-known and recognized marks is Coach’s 28 Signature “C” Mark (see below). Coach has used the Signature “C” Mark in 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Dockets.Justia.com 1 association with the sale of goods since as early as 2001. The Signature “C” Mark was 2 first registered at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on September 24, 2002. 3 Registrations for the Signature “C” Mark include, but are not limited to, U.S. Reg. 4 Nos. 2,832,589; 3,695,290; and 2,534,429 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Plaintiff has alleged that Defendant’s importation, distribution, advertisement, offering for sale, and sale of products which infringe upon Coach’s Signature “C” Mark constitute trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et. seq. and under the common law. 4. Defendant and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach Marks, include either directly or contributorily, in any manner, including generally, but not limited to manufacturing, importing, distributing, advertising, selling and/or offering for sale any unauthorized product bearing the Signature “C” Mark, or marks confusingly similar or substantially similar to Coach’s Signature “C” Mark, and, specifically from: (a) Using Coach’s Signature “C” Mark or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation thereof in connection with the manufacture, importation, distribution, advertisement, offer for sale and/or sale of merchandise comprising not the genuine products of Coach, or in any manner likely to cause others to believe that Defendant’s products are connected with Coach or Coach’s genuine merchandise; (b) Passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any products or other items that are not Coach’s genuine merchandise as and for Coach’s genuine merchandise; 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 (c) Leasing space to any tenant who is engaged in the manufacturing, 2 purchasing, production, distribution, circulation, sale, offering for sale, importation, 3 exportation, advertisement, promotion, display, shipping, marketing of Infringing 4 Products; 5 6 (d) Committing any other acts calculated to cause purchasers to believe that Defendant’s products are Coach’s genuine merchandise unless they are such; 7 (e) Shipping, delivering, holding for sale, distributing, returning, 8 transferring or otherwise moving, storing or disposing of in any manner items falsely 9 bearing the Coach Marks, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation 10 thereof; and 11 (f) Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or 12 entity in performing any of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs 4(a) to 13 4(e) above. 14 5. Without any admission of liability, the parties have agreed that Defendant 15 shall pay to Plaintiff an amount in settlement of Plaintiff’s demand for damages, 16 profits, costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees based upon Defendant’s alleged 17 infringing activities. Plaintiff and Defendant shall bear their own costs associated with 18 this action. 19 6. The execution of this Final Judgment shall serve to bind and obligate the 20 parties hereto. 21 7. The jurisdiction of this Court is retained for the purpose of making any 22 further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this Final 23 Judgment, the enforcement thereof and the punishment of any violations thereof. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice as to Defendant Min Jung Lee dba Bag Stige. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: August 2, 2011 __________________________ 7 Hon. Christine A. Snyder United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
