Dale Jung v. John Marshal
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge A. Howard Matz 21 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. (san)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
DALE JUNG,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
JOHN MARSHAL, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 10-1732-AHM (JEM)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and
18
files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
19
Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a
20
de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
21
Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and
22
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with
24
prejudice.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
DATED: September 26, 2011
A. HOWARD MATZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
