Bruce Lisker v. City of Los Angeles et al
Filing
173
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES without prejudice Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 90 . Defendants may renew that motion or file a different and presumably far more streamlined and focused motion sometime before trial, but after the motions in limine have been decided. (jp)
O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 09-09374 AHM (AJWx)
Title
BRUCE LISKER v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.
Present: The
Honorable
Date
September 13, 2011
A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Stephen Montes
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs:
Proceedings:
Tape No.
Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:
IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)
The Court has looked at the issues and arguments that the parties addressed or
made in their respective papers relating to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
(Dkt. No. 90.) Given what transpired at yesterday’s status conference and the high
likelihood that some (perhaps many) of the parties’ contentions will also be addressed in
their forthcoming motions in limine, and further given that it is likely that at least some of
the rulings on those motions in limine will clarify the nature of this dispute and of any
trial, it would be ill-advised for the Court to devote further efforts to ruling on the
pending Motion for Summary Judgment.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment.1 Defendants may renew that motion or file a different and
presumably far more streamlined and focused motion sometime before trial, but after the
motions in limine have been decided.
:
Initials of Preparer
1
SMO
Dkt. No. 90.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?