Henry Neve Gomez v. K. Harrington
Filing
25
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Gary A. Feess for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 23 . (ca)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
HENRY NEVE GOMEZ,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
K. HARRINGTON,
Respondent.
CASE NO. CV 09-6819-GAF (PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the
17
Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of
18
United States Magistrate Judge.
19
objections to the Report.
20
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
21
Petitioner has not filed any
The Court accepts the findings and
Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and
22
Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a
23
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and,
24
therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in this
25
26
27
28
1
action.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El
2
v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).
3
4
DATED:
September 8, 2011
.
5
6
GARY A. FEESS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C:\Temp\notesE1EF34\Order accep r&r.wpd
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
