Stephen Stinson v. Matthew Cates
Filing
25
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge S. James Otero: IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition on the merits with prejudice. (jm)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
STEPHEN STINSON,
Petitioner,
11
v.
12
13
MATHEW CATES,
Respondent.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV 09-6417 SJO (FFM)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records
17
and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
18
Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs
19
with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate
20
Judge.
21
22
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition
on the merits with prejudice.
May 7, 2012.
23
24
DATED:
25
26
27
28
S. JAMES OTERO
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
