Securities and Exchange Commission v. Avery Dennison Corporation, No. 2:2009cv05493 - Document 12 (C.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Avery Dennison Corporation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Avery shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of $200,000 pursuant to Sect ion 21(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that theConsent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Avery shall co mply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Related to: First REQUEST for Judgment Ordering Civil Penalties 11 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Avery Dennison Corporation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Doc. 12 FINOLA H. MANVELIAN, Cal. Bar No. 180681 E-mail: manvelianf@sec.gov MARSHALL S. SPRUNG, Cal. Bar No. 188253 E-mail: sprungm@sec.gov JUNLING MA, Cal. Bar No. 213241 E-mail: maj@sec.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission Rosalind R. Tyson, Regional Director Andrew G. Petillon, Associate Regional Director John M. McCoy III, Regional Trial Counsel 5670 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90036-3648 Telephone: (323) 965-3998 Facsimile: (323) 965-3908 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 Case No. CV09-5493 DSF (CWx) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ORDERING PENALTY vs. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) having filed a Complaint (“Complaint”) and Defendant Avery Dennison Corporation (“Avery”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Avery and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), in the Consent of Defendant Avery Dennison Corporation to Entry of Final Judgment Ordering Penalty (“Consent”); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 I. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Avery 3 shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of $200,000 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of 4 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3). Avery shall make this 5 payment within ten (10) business days after entry of this Final Judgment by 6 certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable 7 to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The payment shall be delivered or 8 mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange 9 Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0-3, 10 Alexandria, Virginia 22312, and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying 11 Avery as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of 12 this action and the name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made 13 pursuant to this Final Judgment. Avery shall pay post-judgment interest on any 14 delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Commission shall remit the 15 funds paid pursuant to this paragraph to the United States Treasury. 16 II. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the 18 Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth 19 herein, and that Avery shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements 20 set forth therein. 21 III. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this 23 Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms 24 of this Final Judgment. 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 18, 2009, 2009 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
