-RC Jeromy Willett et al v. County of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2009cv04599 - Document 80 (C.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT UPON JURY VERDICT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, Related to: Judgment 76 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment upon all claims shall be entered in favor of defendant Lieutenant Scroggin and against the plaintiff Jeromy Willett. 2. Judgment upon all claims shall be entered in favor of defendant Lieutenant Scroggin and against the plaintiff Jill Heimann. 3. The defendant shall have and recover costs in the amount of $2,705.88, pursuant to the approved Bill of Costs together with post-judgment interest accrued thereon at the legal rate. (rla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-RC Jeromy Willett et al v. County of Los Angeles et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 Doc. 80 Henry Patrick Nelson, CSB #32249 Amber A. Logan, CSB #166395 Rina M. Mathevosian, CSB #251423 Nelson & Fulton Equitable Plaza, Suite 2800 3435 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA. 90010-2014 Tel. (213)365-2703 / Fax (213)365-9130 nelson-fulton@covad.net Attorneys for Defendant, Lieutenant Jeff Scroggin 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Jeromy Willett and Jill Heimann, Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. 15 County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff, Lieutenant Jeff Scroggin and DOES 1 to 10, 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 CASE NO. CV 09-04599 JST (RCx) AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT UPON JURY VERDICT (PROPOSED) Trial: Time : Place: Judge: February 1, 2011 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 10A Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker Pursuant to the unanimous decision of the Jury documented upon the form of Special Verdict dated and signed February 3, 2011, by the Presiding Juror: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1. Judgment upon all claims shall be entered in favor of defendant Lieutenant Scroggin and against the plaintiff Jeromy Willett. //// 27 28 -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Judgment upon all claims shall be entered in favor of 2 defendant Lieutenant Scroggin and against the plaintiff Jill 3 Heimann. 4 3. The defendant shall have and recover costs in the amount 5 of $2,705.88, pursuant to the approved Bill of Costs together with 6 post-judgment interest accrued thereon at the legal rate. 7 8 4. There being no remaining defendants, this action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. 9 10 11 March 29, 2011 DATED: _________________ JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER ______________________________ HON. JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
