George Edward Ford v. Kenneth Clark
Filing
56
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Dean D. Pregerson for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 54 . (ca)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GEORGE EDWARD FORD,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
14
v.
KENNETH CLARK,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV 09-725-DDP (PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the
17
Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of
18
the United States Magistrate Judge.
19
objections to the Report and Recommendation.
20
findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
21
Petitioner has not filed any
The Court accepts the
Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and
22
Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a
23
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and,
24
25
26
27
28
1
therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied.
See Rules
2
Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts,
3
Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El
4
v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).
5
6
DATED:
September 7, 2011 .
7
8
DEAN D. PREGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C:\Temp\notesE1EF34\Ford v Clark CV09-725 Order Adopt R R and Deny COA.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?