Lan Dow v. 3M Company et al, No. 2:2008cv04554 - Document 93 (C.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT ON CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: The Settlement Class represented herein by Plaintiff is defined as all persons who have been employed in a non-exempt capacity at the 3M Northridge, California facility at any time between June 30, 2004 and May 1, 2009. This Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate and the following factors support final approval: (1) the risks that Defendant would defeat class certification and prevail on its defenses; (2) t he $375,000 settlement amount is within the range of reasonableness; (3) the parties engaged in discovery and negotiations before entering into the proposed settlement; (4) class counsel are experienced in wage and hour class actions and have co ncluded that the settlement is fair and reasonable; (5) class members have reacted favorably to the notice of settlement, with only one putative class member submitting a valid opt-out election. (See attached Judgment for further information). The u nopposed application of Class Counsel for costs and attorneys' fees award is hereby granted. Defendant shall pay $125,000 to Class Counsel out of the Settlement Fund as attorney's fees, $8,881.62 for expenses incurred in the litig ation, and $4,000 for claims administration. Defendant shall pay $25,000 out of the Settlement Fund as an incentive award to named Plaintiff, Lan Dao, as is required under the Settlement Agreement. This action is hereby dismissed on the merits with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of resolving any disputes that may arise as to the implementation of the monetary relief terms of the Settlement Agreement. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lan Dow v. 3M Company et al Doc. 93 1 MARIA C. ROBERTS, California State Bar No. 137907 maria.roberts@stokesroberts.com 2 PETER B. MARETZ, California State Bar No. 144826 pmaretz@stokesroberts.com 3 RONALD R. GIUSSO, California State Bar No. 184483 rgiusso@stokesroberts.com 4 STOKES ROBERTS & WAGNER, ALC 600 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 1150 5 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 TELEPHONE: (619) 232-4261 (619) 232-4840 6 FACSIMILE: JS-6 7 Attorneys for 3M Company, a Delaware Corporation 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAN DAO, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 3M COMPANY, a Delaware 15 Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 CASE NO. CV-08-04554 VBF (AGRx) CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT ON CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Date: Time: Dept: Judge: October 30, 2009 3:00 p.m. 9 Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 1 CV-08-04554 VBF (AGRx) 4845-8833-8181.1 Dockets.Justia.com 1. 1 The Settlement Class represented herein by Plaintiff is defined as all 2 persons who have been employed in a non-exempt capacity at the 3M Northridge, 3 California facility at any time between June 30, 2004 and May 1, 2009. 4 2. 5 This Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate and the 6 following factors support final approval: (1) the risks that Defendant would defeat 7 class certification and prevail on its defenses; (2) the $375,000 settlement amount is 8 within the range of reasonableness; (3) the parties engaged in discovery and 9 negotiations before entering into the proposed settlement; (4) class counsel are 10 experienced in wage and hour class actions and have concluded that the settlement 11 is fair and reasonable; (5) class members have reacted favorably to the notice of 12 settlement, with only one putative class member submitting a valid opt-out election. 13 3. 14 The Notice to class members was reasonable and adequate. Out of the 15 276 notice packets sent to putative class members, only two notice packets were 16 returned to the claims administrator as undelivered and only one putative class 17 member opted out. 18 4. 19 The following requirements for class certification under Federal Rules 20 of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b) are met with respect to the Settlement Class and for 21 settlement purposes only: 22 Numerosity - This Settlement Class is composed of 276 employees, 23 all of whom are readily identifiable from 3M's payroll records. 24 Therefore, the numerosity requirement is satisfied. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 2 4845-8833-8181.1 CV-08-04554 VBF (AGRx) 1 Commonality - The Settlement Class shares sufficient commonality 2 in that each was a non-exempt employee at 3M's Northridge plant 3 during the class period and, according to the terms of the settlement 4 reached, each will receive a proportionate share of the class 5 proceeds based on their number of workweeks during the class 6 period. 7 8 Typicality - Plaintiff Lan Dao is one of the 276 non-exempt 9 employees who worked at 3M's Northridge facility during the class 10 period. 11 12 Adequate Representation - For purposes of the settlement being 13 proposed as reached between the parties, there are no conflicts of 14 interest between the named Plaintiff Lan Dao and the defined class 15 members. In addition, there are no known conflicts with Plaintiff's 16 counsel. Moreover, Plaintiff's counsel, who has represented 17 numerous class members in numerous Class Actions, has 18 represented that they can and will adequately represent the class. 19 20 Predominance – The class is sufficiently cohesive to warrant 21 adjudication by representation. 22 23 Superiority - A class action is superior to individual 24 lawsuits/settlements, because it allows the class members to pool 25 claims which would be uneconomical to litigate individually. 26 Accordingly, this Class Settlement is consistent with that policy of 27 economy and efficiency. 28 / / / 3 4845-8833-8181.1 CV-08-04554 VBF (AGRx) 1 5. The unopposed application of Class Counsel for costs and attorneys' 2 fees award is hereby granted. Defendant shall pay $125,000 to Class Counsel out of 3 the Settlement Fund as attorney's fees, $8,881.62 for expenses incurred in the 4 litigation, and $4,000 for claims administration. 5 6 6. Defendant shall pay $25,000 out of the Settlement Fund as an incentive 7 award to named Plaintiff, Lan Dao, as is required under the Settlement Agreement. 8 9 7. All Class Members as identified on Exhibit A as attached hereto, 10 excluding the one class member who timely opted out of the settlement, are bound 11 by the instant Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal With Prejudice and by the 12 previously-approved Settlement Agreement. All said Class members are also bound 13 by the Release of All claims against 3M Company, including: 14 15 8. Plaintiff and Settlement Class Members, and each of them, forever 16 release, discharge, and covenant not to sue 3M for any of the Released Claims, as 17 set forth in the Settlement Agreement, in connection with their employment at 3M, 18 which release shall be understood to include all past and present claims which they 19 do not know of or suspect to exist in their favor at the time of this release and which, 20 if known by them, might have affected their settlement and release of 3M, or might 21 have affected their decision not to object to this Agreement, all past and present 22 rights, causes of action, damages, judgment executions, liens, attachments, debts, 23 and demands, whether known or unknown and whether foreseen or unforeseen as 24 relating only to the “Released Claims” by Named Plaintiff and Settlement Class 25 Members, including but not limited to those which are alleged or could have been 26 alleged in this Action, including for California Labor Code violations, unfair 27 competition, unfair business practices, restitution or injunctive relief arising out of 28 or related to the “Released Claims” and employment with 3M; for declaratory 4 4845-8833-8181.1 CV-08-04554 VBF (AGRx) 1 and/or injunctive relief under Business & Professions Code section 17200 et seq.; 2 for attorneys' fees, costs, consequential damages, disgorgement, punitive damages, 3 connected to their employment and only as to the “Released Claims” with 3M. The 4 Released Claims” do not include separate claims, if any, that might have been 5 brought, or will be brought, with respect to workers' compensation law, or claim for 6 discrimination, personal injury, harassment, fraud, negligence or breach of contract 7 or any other claim unrelated to the “Released Claims.” 8 9 9. The parties are hereby directed to perform the terms of the Settlement 10 Agreement. 11 12 10. This action is hereby dismissed on the merits with prejudice. The 13 Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of resolving any disputes 14 that may arise as to the implementation of the monetary relief terms of the 15 Settlement Agreement. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED 18 19 DATED:_October 30, 2009_________________ Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank District Court Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 4845-8833-8181.1 CV-08-04554 VBF (AGRx)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
