-AJW Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc. v. Preci-Dip Durtal SA, No. 2:2008cv04226 - Document 159 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: NON-FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,250,974 by Judge Gary A. Feess. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Preci-Dip has not infringed claims 1-3, 7, 13 and16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,250,974 as those claims have been construed by this Court. (bp)

Download PDF
-AJW Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc. v. Preci-Dip Durtal SA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Doc. 159 TODD M. SORRELL (BAR NO. 175143) tsorrell@fulbright.com SPENCER PERSSON (BAR NO. 235054) spersson@fulbright.com FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 555 South Flower Street, Forty-First Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 892-9200 Facsimile: (213) 892-9494 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. DARREN M. FRANKLIN, Cal. Bar No. 210939 dfranklin@sheppardmullin.com SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 Telephone: 213-620-1780 Facsimile: 213-620-1398 ROBERT E. BROWNE (pro hac vice) rbrowne@ngelaw.com MIKE R. TURNER (pro hac vice) mturner@ngelaw.com NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLP Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60602-3801 Telephone: 312-269-8000 Facsimile: 312-269-1747 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant PRECI-DIP SA 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 20 21 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] NON-FINAL JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,250,974 Plaintiff, 22 23 Case No. CV 08-04226 GAF (AJWx) TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. PRECI-DIP DURTAL SA, Defendant, AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 27 28 N EAL , G ERBER & E ISENBERG LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW CHICAGO SMRH:405643827.1 -1- [PROPOSED] NON-FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc. (“Tri- 2 Star”) and Defendant and Counter-Claimant Preci-Dip SA (sued as Preci-Dip 3 Durtal SA) (“Preci-Dip”), having stipulated that the electrical contact devices 4 accused by Tri-Star of infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,250,974 in this matter do not 5 infringe claims 1-3, 7, 13 and 16 of that patent as its terms have been construed by 6 this Court, and having stipulated to a Judgment by this Court granting Preci-Dip’s 7 request for a declaration of non-infringement, and good cause appearing for 8 granting the stipulation, 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Preci- 10 Dip has not infringed claims 1-3, 7, 13 and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,250,974 as 11 those claims have been construed by this Court. This is not intended to be a Final 12 Judgment in this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), and any time to 13 appeal this judgment will not begin to run until a final judgment is entered at the 14 conclusion of this matter. Tri-Star may object to or appeal this Judgment and the 15 Court’s Order re: Claim Construction, including an appeal of the claim 16 constructions of the ‘974 Patent. 17 18 DATED: July 5, 2012 19 20 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 Submitted by: SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By /s/ Darren M. Franklin DARREN M. FRANKLIN 25 26 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant PRECI-DIP SA 27 28 NGEDOCS: 1989707.3 N EAL , G ERBER & E ISENBERG LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW CHICAGO SMRH:405643827.1 -2- [PROPOSED] NON-FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.