Master Replicas, Inc. v. Levitation Arts Inc. et al, No. 2:2008cv01846 - Document 149 (C.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, The Court hereby enters final Judgment as follows: 1. The Technology Licensing Agreement by and between Levitations Arts Inc. and Master Replicas, Inc. is terminated as of July 28, 2009. Title to and ownership of th e patent was never in Master Replicas, Inc. 2. A default judgment was entered against Master Replicas, Inc. effective August 21, 2009, at 3:45 PM. 3. The sole remaining claim against Michael Cookson, as an individual, for unjust enrichment, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 4. All other claims asserted in this action are hereby dismissed, with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Master Replicas, Inc. v. Levitation Arts Inc. et al Doc. 149 JS-6 1 Bruce Isaacs, Esq. SBN 100926 bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com WYMAN & ISAACS LLP 3 5757 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 475 4 Tele: (323) 648-4141 Fax: (323) 648-4133 5 2 6 Attorneys for Counter-Defendant Michael Cookson 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DIVISION ) MASTER REPLICAS, INC., a California corporation, now known as ) ) Corgi International Ltd., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LEVITATION ARTS, INC., a Kentucky corporation; KAREN A. ) ) SHERLOCK, an individual; ) MICHAEL F. SHERLOCK, an individual; and Does 1-100, Inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION ) ______________________________ ) Case No.: CV 08-1846 DOC (MLGx) (Assigned to the Hon. David O. Carter, Courtroom “9D”) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 26 27 28 BI/MASTER REPLICAS-LEVITATION ARTS/JUDGMENT RE TRIAL Dockets.Justia.com 1 Based on the Findings of Facts and the Conclusions of Law entered by the 2 Court contemporaneously herewith, the Court hereby enters final Judgment as 3 follows: 4 1. The Technology Licensing Agreement by and between Levitations Arts 5 Inc. and Master Replicas, Inc. is terminated as of July 28, 2009. Title to and 6 ownership of the patent was never in Master Replicas, Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 2. A default judgment was entered against Master Replicas, Inc. effective August 21, 2009, at 3:45 PM. 3. The sole remaining claim against Michael Cookson, as an individual, for unjust enrichment, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 4. All other claims asserted in this action are hereby dismissed, with prejudice. 13 14 Dated: August 27, 2009 15 __________________________________ THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BI/MASTER REPLICA-LEVITATION ARTS/JUDGMENT RE TRIAL 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 Pursuant to FRCP 5, I certify that I am an employee of the law firm of 3 WYMAN & ISAACS LLP, and that on the date shown below, I caused service of a 4 true and correct copy of the attached: 5 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 7 to be completed by: 8 personally delivering 9 10 sending via Federal Express or other overnight delivery service X 11 thereto. 12 delivery via facsimile machine to fax no. 13 14 depositing for mailing in the U.S. mail with sufficient postage affixed X electronic filing, and thereby delivery via e-mail to: 15 16 17 18 19 20 Paul Adams, Esq., SBN 42146 THE ADAMS LAW FIRM 901 Rio Grande Blvd., NW Suite H262 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104 E-Mail: adamspatentlaw@gmail.com Paul Adams, Esq. THE ADAMS LAW FIRM 550 W. C Street, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated this 25th day of August, 2009 /s/Lina Pearmain Lina Pearmain
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
