Curtis Clark v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al, No. 2:2008cv00865 - Document 46 (C.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED: Judgment as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff shall be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff Curtis Clark; the action of Plaintiff against Defendant is dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his action against Defendant. (bp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Curtis Clark v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP L. JULIUS M. TURMAN, State Bar No. 226126 One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.442.1001 Attorneys for Defendant PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, 14 16 Case No. CV 08-0865 GAF (PJWx) CURTIS CLARK, 13 15 E-FILED 11/5/2010 MATTHEW S. MENZIE, State Bar No. 211404 mmenzie@morganlewis.com 300 South Grand Ave., 22nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 Tel: 213.612.2500 Fax: 213.612.2501 10 12 Doc. 46 vs. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ON ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Judge: Hon. Gary A. Feess Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential” or “Defendant”) filed a Motion For Summary Judgment on May 28, 2009. The matter was heard before this Court on June 22, 2009. The Court, having considered the parties’ moving, opposing, reply and supplemental papers and the evidentiary record as a whole, concluded that all of Plaintiff’s claims fail for the reasons provided in the Court’s Order. Accordingly, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims and Causes of Action. The Order Granting Defendant’s Motion is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. 28 & M ORGAN , L EWIS B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO DB2/22016896.1 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ON ORDER CASE NO. CV 08-0865 GAF (PJWX) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED: Judgment as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff shall be entered in favor of 5 Defendant and against Plaintiff Curtis Clark; the action of Plaintiff against 6 Defendant is dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his action 7 against Defendant. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: November 4, 2010 _______________________________ Hon. Gary A. Feess Judge of the United States District Court, Central District 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO DB2/22016896.1 2 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ON ORDER CASE NO. CV 08-0865 GAF (PJWX)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
