Samantha Jenkins v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/24/2008. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause on or before December 24, 2008, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice fo r failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. Filing and service of a motion for judgment on the pleadings on or before December 24,2008, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is cautioned that, if she fails to file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings or otherwise respond to this Order to Show Cause on or before December 24, 2008, this Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. (mp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 08-603-CAS (AGR) Samantha Jenkins v. Michael J. Astrue Date November 25, 2008
Present: The Honorable Marine Pogosyan Deputy Clerk
Alicia G. Rosenberg, United States Magistrate Judge
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: None Proceedings: In Chambers
Attorneys Present for Defendant: None
RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On August 11, 2008, this Court granted counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Samantha Jenkins. (Dkt. No. 16.) The order became effective when counsel filed a proof of service evidencing that Plaintiff was served with the court order. (Dkt. No. 17.) No Notice of Appearance has been filed by new counsel. Therefore, as set forth in the Order dated August 11, 2008, this matter proceeds with Samantha Jenkins appearing pro se. Pursuant to the Order dated August 11, 2008, Plaintiff Samantha Jenkins was to file and serve her motion for judgment on the pleadings on or before November 19, 2008. The Order stated that "[i]f Plaintiff does not file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings on or before November 19, 2008, this action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962). To date, Plaintiff has not filed and served a motion for judgment on the pleadings. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause on or before December 24, 2008, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. Filing and service of a motion for judgment on the pleadings on or before December 24, 2008, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is cautioned that, if she fails to file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings or
CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 08-603-CAS (AGR) Samantha Jenkins v. Michael J. Astrue Date November 25, 2008
otherwise respond to this Order to Show Cause on or before December 24, 2008, this Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962).
cc: The parties 0 Initials of Preparer mp : 0
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?