Transamerica Annuity Service Corporation et al v. Danielle Alexander-Mackey et al, No. 2:2007cv08141 - Document 26 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper: In accordance wit the Court's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment 24 , the Court hereby enters Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs Transamerica Annuity Service C orporation and Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and against Danielle Alexander-Mackey in the amount of $829,869.97, which represents the prinicipal amount of $567,070.81, plus interest at the rate of 7% per annum from 5/15/96 through 9/29/08. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mg)

Download PDF
Transamerica Annuity Service Corporation et al v. Danielle Alexander-Mackey et al Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 T R A N S A M E R I C A A N N U I T Y) SERVICE CORPORATION, a New) M e x i c o C o r p o r a t i o n , a n d) TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an ) ) Iowa Corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) DANIELLE ALEXANDER) MACKEY a/k/a DANIELLE MARIA ) MACKEY-COLEMAN a/k/a ) DANIELLE MACKEY a/k/a ) DANIELLE M. COLEMAN a/k/a ) DANIELLE ALEXANDER) COLEMAN a/k/a DANIELLE M. ) ALEXANDER and DOES 1 to 10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:07-cv-8141-FMC-JCRx FINAL JUDGMENT 23 In accordance with the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion 24 for Summary Judgment (docket no. 24), the Court hereby enters Final Judgment in 25 favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Danielle Alexander-Mackey in the amount 26 of $829,869.97, which represents the principal amount of $567,070.81, plus interest 27 at the rate of 7% per annum from May 15, 1996 through September 29, 2008. 28 // Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: October 1, 2008 3 4 5 6 FLORENCE-MARIE COOPER, JUDGE 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.