Briand Williams v. County of Ventura et al, No. 2:2007cv07655 - Document 78 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge A. Howard Matz for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 76 : The Court ORDERS: The second amended complaint be DISMISSED as to Defendants County of Ven tura, Ventura County Sheriff Robert Brooks, Defendant Stelly, Defendant Perez, J. Clark, Michael Harris, P. Gomez, R. Garcia, A. Powell, R. Wade, A. Ramirez, Daniel Goodrich, R. Deopking, J. Gray, J. Eisenhard, T. Miller, F. Valdez IV, Richard Savill e, M. De La Huerta, Jeffrey S. Miller, S. Karing, J. Miller, P. Mendoza, and John Glueckert WITH PREJUDICE and without leave to amend. (See document for further details.) This action should proceed only against Deputy J. Holt, Deputy A. Wilkinson, Deputy R. Hull, Deputy F. Sedeno, Deputy J. Cashmark, Deputy A. Stone, Deputy R. Rawston, Senior Deputy P. Frank, Sergeant R. Bassi, and Sergeant Renee Ferguson, on the causes of action noted in the Report and Recommendation. (rla)

Download PDF
Briand Williams v. County of Ventura et al Doc. 78 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.