Chris Shoff et al v. AT&T et al, No. 2:2007cv03289 - Document 82 (C.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: This Court hereby enters final judgment in this case, and dismisses it with prejudice, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Joint Stipulation (Settlement Agreement), Order Granting Prel iminary Approval, and the Order Granting Final Approval to Class Action Settlement (Final Approval Order). The Court hereby permanently enjoins and restrains all individuals from asserting any and all claims that were released pursuant to the Settlem ent Agreement and the Final Approval Order.Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court reserves exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this action, the named Plaintiffs, the Class, and the Defendants for the purposes of supervising the implementation, enforcement, construction and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, and all orders and judgments entered in connection therewith. IT IS SO ORDERED., (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Chris Shoff et al v. AT&T et al Doc. 82 1 2 3 JS 6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 CHRIS SHOFF AND RICHARD TRAISTER, Plaintiffs, vs. AT&T, SBC SERVICES, INC., SOUTHWESTERN BELL, YELLOW PAGES, INC., IYP GROUP, LLC, YELLOW PAGES.COM LLC AND/OR DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Inclusive, CASE NO. CV 07-3289 DSF (AGRx) FINAL JUDGMENT Judge: Hon. Dale Fischer Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal. CV 07-3289 DSF (AGRx) LEGAL_US_W # 59468943.1 36516.00113 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia 1 2 WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, this Court granted preliminary approval to a settlement of this action; 3 4 WHEREAS, the Court granted final approval to the settlement on 5 October 20, 2008, finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate within the 6 meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) and applicable law; and 7 8 WHEREAS, the Court has found that the notice sent to the Class Members 9 fairly and adequately informed the Class of the terms of the settlement, was consistent 10 with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, and was given in the manner 11 prescribed by the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s order preliminarily approving 12 the settlement: 13 14 This Court hereby enters final judgment in this case, and dismisses it with 15 prejudice, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Joint 16 Stipulation (“Settlement Agreement”), Order Granting Preliminary Approval, and the 17 Order Granting Final Approval to Class Action Settlement (“Final Approval Order”). 18 The Court hereby permanently enjoins and restrains all individuals from asserting any 19 and all claims that were released pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the Final 20 Approval Order. 21 22 Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court 23 reserves exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this action, the named Plaintiffs, the 24 Class, and the Defendants for the purposes of supervising the implementation, 25 26 27 28 U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal. CV 07-3289 DSF (AGRx) LEGAL_US_W # 59468943.1 2 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 1 enforcement, construction and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, and all orders 2 and judgments entered in connection therewith. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED 5 6 Dated: 2/10/09 ______________________________ Hon. Dale Fischer United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal. CV 07-3289 DSF (AGRx) LEGAL_US_W # 59468943.1 3 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
