Settlement Recovery Center LLC v. Valueclick Inc et al, No. 2:2007cv02638 - Document 30 (C.D. Cal. 2007)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper re MOTION to Dismiss [11], MOTION to Strike[12]. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Value Click, Inc., Commission Junction, Inc., and Be Frees Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (docket no. 11), and Defendants Motion to Strike Requests for Certain Relief (docket no. 12), filed on June 13, 2007. The Court has read and considered the moving, opposition, and reply documents submitted in connection with both motions. The Court deems the matters appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. For the reasons and in the manner set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and DENIES Defendants' Motion to Strike. (ama)

Download PDF
Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Settlement Recovery Center LLC v. Valueclick Inc et al Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 13 Doc. 3 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 3 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 4 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 5 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 6 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 7 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 8 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 9 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 10 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 11 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 12 of 13 Case 2:07-cv-02638-FMC-CT Document 30 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 13 of 13

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.