Harrison v. Tilton

Filing 87

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge George H Wu re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Protective Order for RE: Production of Confidential Information 85 (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DAVID SCOTT HARRISON, 13 14 16 17 18 19 Having considered the Ex Parte Application of Defendants and 20 Ironwood State Prison Warden Debra Dexter, along with the Stipulation of the 21 Parties regarding Confidential Information to be produced in this case, the Court 22 finds good cause for entry of a Protective Order as follows: 23 24 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Plaintiff served a subpoena duces tecum for documents to Ironwood vs. Defendants. Plaintiff, Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) PROTECTIVE ORDER Judge: Hon. George H. Wu UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 15 JAMES TILTON, et al., 25 State Prison Warden Debra Dexter (the "Warden"); in response thereto, the Warden 26 is producing documents deemed privileged and/or confidential, including personnel 27 records of the defendant correctional officers, and other information designated as 28 Official Information. Documents produced under these designations, as well as 18311/2690402. Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 information copies or extracted therefrom, including testimony, conversations, or 2 presentations by parties or counsel to or in court, shall be referred to as 3 "Confidential Information," and shall be subject to this Protective Order. 4 5 2. DURATION The confidentiality obligations imposed by this Protective Order shall 6 remain in effect even after the termination of this litigation, and shall not be lifted 7 without further order of this Court. 8 9 3. DESIGNATED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 3.1 Each party or non-party that designates Confidential Information 10 for protection under this Protective Order shall ensure that such designation is not 11 over-broad, and applies only to those materials, documents, items, or 12 communications (or portions thereof) for which such protection is warranted. 13 3.2 Confidential Information protected by this Protective Order must 14 be clearly designated prior to the disclosure or production of such Confidential 15 Information, and must bear the notation of "Confidential" or "Attorneys' Eyes 16 Only" on each page that contains Confidential Information. 17 3.3 An inadvertent failure to designated Confidential Information 18 does not waive the producing party's right to secure protection under this Protective 19 Order. If the producing party discovers after production of the Confidential 20 Information that the information is lacking the appropriate designation, the 21 producing party must timely notify the receiving party, who shall make reasonable 22 effort to ensure that the Confidential Information is treated in accordance with the 23 provisions of this Order. 24 25 4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE OF INFORMATION 4.1 Under no circumstances shall Confidential Information be used 26 in any proceeding other than the instant case or be disseminated, in any form, except 27 by order of this Court. Confidential Information must be stored and maintained by 28 18311/2690402.2 -2- Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 the receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is 2 limited to the person authorized under this Protective Order. 3 5 7 8 9 this action; 10 11 litigation; 12 14 d. e. during their depositions, witnesses who, from the face of experts or consultants retained/consulted to work on this 13 the document, appear to have previously authored or received it; and, 15 case by counsel for any party to this action (so long as each such expert or 16 consultant agrees, in writing, to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order). 17 19 below: 20 21 22 this action; 23 24 litigation; and 25 d. experts or consultants retained/consulted to work on this 26 case by counsel for any party to this action (so long as each such expert or 27 consultant agrees, in writing, to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order). 28 18311/2690402.2 4.2 4.3 Confidential information and information derived therefrom may Disclosure of Confidential Information designated "Confidential" a. b. c. Any Party to this action and that Party's counsel; staff and personnel employed by counsel for any party to the Court and court personnel, in connection with this 4 not be disclosed in any form to anyone not covered under this protective order. 6 shall be limited to the personnel and/or classification of persons listed below: 4.4 Disclosure of Confidential Information designated "Attorneys' 18 Eyes Only" shall be limited to the personnel and/or classification of persons listed a. b. c. Counsel for any party to this action; staff and personnel employed by counsel for any party to the Court and court personnel, in connection with this -3- Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 4.5 This section is not intended to limit the ability of counsel to 2 prepare Plaintiff for his deposition or for participation at trial; however, under no 3 circumstances shall Confidential Information designated "Attorneys' Eyes Only" be 4 provided directly to the Plaintiff, Inmate David Scott Harrison. 5 4.6 Counsel for any party to this action shall advise those individuals 6 to whom disclosure of Confidential Information is to be made of the contents of this 7 Protective Order, and such counsel shall obtain the consent of such individual that 8 he or she will be bound by this Protective Order, prior to disclosure of Confidential 9 Information. In the event such individual does not consent to be bound by this 10 Protective Order, no disclosure of Confidential Information shall be made to that 11 individual. 12 4.7 Any counsel, expert, consultant or investigator retained by 13 counsel for any party to this case shall not refer to Confidential Information in any 14 other court proceeding without further order of this Court. 15 4.8 Nothing in this Protective Order is intended to prevent officials 16 or employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or 17 other authorized individuals from having access to Confidential Information to 18 which they would have had access in the normal course of their duties. 19 4.9 The parties shall made good faith efforts to consent to the use of 20 Confidential Information, and shall meet and confer to discuss redactions of 21 particularly sensitive information before making use thereof. 22 24 5. CHALLENGES TO DESIGNATIONS OF CONFIDENTIAL 5.1 Should a party challenge the confidentiality of information so 23 INFORMATION 25 designated, that party must do so in good faith, and shall confer directly with 26 counsel for the producing party. 27 5.2 If the parties are unable to resolve the designation informally, the 28 party challenging the designation may file and serve a motion under Civil Local 18311/2690402.2 -4- Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Rule 7 (an in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable), identifying the 2 basis for the challenge. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding 3 shall be on the Designating Party. The designation of the challenged information 4 shall remain unchanged under the Court rules on the challenge. 5 7 6. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL If a receiving party learns that it has disclosed Confidential Information 6 INFORMATION 8 to any person or entity not authorized to receive such information pursuant to this 9 Protective Order, the receiving party shall immediately (a) notify the producing 10 party of the unauthorized disclosure, including identification of the person or entity 11 to whom such unauthorized disclosure was made, (b) retrieve all copies of the 12 Confidential Information from the unauthorized recipient, (c) inform the 13 unauthorized recipient of the terms of this Protective Order and request that they 14 agree, in writing, to be bound hereto. Should the Court determine that the receiving 15 party intentionally disclosed Confidential Information to an unauthorized party, the 16 Court may consider the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to 17 monetary sanctions and/or issue preclusion. 18 Under no circumstances shall the receiving party file in the public 19 record any Confidential Information, without written permission from the producing 20 party or an Order of this Court, and only upon timely written notice to all interested 21 parties. The parties shall made good faith efforts to consent to the use of 22 Confidential Information, and shall meet and confer to discuss redactions of 23 particularly sensitive information 24 25 7. RIGHT TO ASSERT OBJECTIONS By the entry of this Protective Order, the parties are not waiving any 26 rights that they might otherwise have to objecting to disclosure or production of 27 information on any ground not addressed herein. The parties do not waive any right 28 to object to the use in evidence of the material covered by this Protective Order. 18311/2690402.2 -5- Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: Nov. 20, 2008 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 18311/2690402.2 The Honorable George H. Wu United States District Court Judge -6- Case No. CV 06-7423-GW (RNB) (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?