Hicks v. Cambria
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge George H Wu, The Court finds that the passage (at Report and Recommendation, p. 19, lines 14-15) reading: a juror should discuss or consider the subject of penalty or punishment, should be corrected to read: a juror should not discuss or consider the subject of penalty or punishment. Subject to this correction, the Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 31 (lmh)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
EDDIE JAMES HICKS,
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
15
ROBERT HERNANDEZ (Warden),
16
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 06-5634-GW(CW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition,
19
records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United
20
States Magistrate Judge.
21
those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has
22
been made.
23
Recommendation, p. 19, lines 14-15) reading: “a juror should ‘discuss
24
or consider the subject of penalty or punishment,’” should be
25
corrected to read: “a juror should not ‘discuss or consider the
26
subject of penalty or punishment.’”
27
Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
28
The Court has engaged in a de novo review of
The Court finds that the passage (at Report and
Subject to this correction, the
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the
Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
3
4
DATED:
September 20, 2011
5
6
GEORGE H. WU
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
