Brown v. Villaraigosa
Filing
182
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero. Pursuant to Rules 54(a) and 58(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment on the merits be entered in favor of Defendants ILDEFONSO FELIX, DREON BROWN , DOUGLAS ZABILSKI, THOMAS RALPH, MARY OCALLAGHAN, MEL HOGG, and SHAWN MASSEY, and against Plaintiff FLINOYD BROWN and that Plaintiff take nothing; and that Defendants ILDEFONSO FELIX, DREON BROWN, DOUGLAS ZABILSKI, THOMAS RALPH, MARY OCALLAGHAN, MEL HOGG, and SHAWN MASSEY, be entitled to recover their costs from the Plaintiff in accordance with Local Rule 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cch)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FLINOYD BROWN,
12
13
14
15
v.
Plaintiff in Pro Se,
ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA, et al.
Defendants.
__________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
Case No. CV 06-4169 SJO (JCR)
U.S. District Judge S. James Otero
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL
1
2
WE, THE JURY, in the above-entitled action now reach our unanimous verdict on
the following questions submitted to us:
3
4
QUESTION NO. 1: Did any of the following defendants use excessive force against
5
Flinoyd Brown?
6
Check “yes” or “no” following the name of each defendant:
7
MARY O’CALLAGHAN
Yes______
No
X
8
THOMAS RALPH
Yes______
No
X
9
MELL HOGG
Yes______
No X
10
SHAWN MASSEY
Yes______
No
X
11
DOUGLAS ZABILSKI
Yes______
No
X
12
ILDEFONSO FELIX
Yes______
No
X
13
DREON BROWN
Yes______
No X
14
If you answered “No” as to all defendants, please sign, date and return the verdict form.
15
If you answered “Yes” a to any defendant, please proceed to Question No. 2.
16
QUESTION NO. 2: For each defendant for whom you answered “Yes” in Question No.
17
2, was the force used by that defendant a substantial factor in causing harm to Flinoyd
18
Brown?
19
Check “yes” or “no” following the name of each defendant for whom you answered “yes”
20
to in Question No. 1:
21
MARY O’CALLAGHAN
Yes______
No______
22
THOMAS RALPH
Yes______
No______
23
MELL HOGG
Yes______
No______
24
SHAWN MASSEY
Yes______
No______
25
DOUGLAS ZABILSKI
Yes______
No______
26
ILDEFONSO FELIX
Yes______
No______
27
DREON BROWN
Yes______
No______
28
-2-
1
If you answered “No” as to all defendants, please sign, date and return the verdict form.
2
If you answered “Yes” as to any defendant, please proceed to the next question.
3
4
5
QUESTION NO. 3: What are plaintiff’s damages?
TOTAL
0
6
7
QUESTION NO. 4: For any of the defendants to whom you answered “Yes” in question
8
number 2, did Plaintiff prove that the defendant acted malicious, oppressive or in reckless
9
disregard of his rights?
10
MARY O’CALLAGHAN
Yes______
No______
11
THOMAS RALPH
Yes______
No______
12
MELL HOGG
Yes______
No______
13
SHAWN MASSEY
Yes______
No______
14
DOUGLAS ZABILSKI
Yes______
No______
15
ILDEFONSO FELIX
Yes______
No______
16
DREON BROWN
Yes______
No______
17
18
Please sign and date the verdict form and return it to the clerk of the Court.
19
20
21
Signed:
Confidential
FOREPERSON
Dated:
August 15, 2013
22
23
Pursuant to Rules 54(a) and 58(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT
24
IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment on the merits be
25
entered in favor of Defendants ILDEFONSO FELIX, DREON BROWN, DOUGLAS
26
ZABILSKI, THOMAS RALPH, MARY O’CALLAGHAN, MEL HOGG, and SHAWN
27
MASSEY, and against Plaintiff FLINOYD BROWN and that Plaintiff take nothing; and
28
-3-
1
that Defendants ILDEFONSO FELIX, DREON BROWN, DOUGLAS ZABILSKI,
2
THOMAS RALPH, MARY O’CALLAGHAN, MEL HOGG, and SHAWN MASSEY, and
3
against Plaintiff FLINOYD BROWN be entitled to recover their costs from the Plaintiff
4
in accordance with Local Rule 54.
5
6
7
August 25, 2013.
DATED: _____________________
__________________________________
S. JAMES OTERO
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
