Joe Hand Promotions v. Claudio Moyeda, et al
Filing
18
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT by Clerk of Court, in favor of Joe Hand Promotions Inc and against Defendant Claudio Moyeda, individually and dba El Rinconcito, jointly and severally ; in the principal amount of $5,150.00, interest in the amount of $12 73.03, (Post-judgment interest on the judgment accruing at the legal rate of 2.5% from the date of entry of 7/9/02); FOR A TOTAL RENEWED JUDGMENT of $6,423.03. Related to: Order on Motion for Entry of Default 10 ; APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment 16 . (mailed NOtice 5/31/12) (lom)
<![CDATA[
L
2
?
4
ERANKLIN J. LOVE, Bar #80334
LAW OFFICE OF FRANKLIN J. LOVE
800 S. Barranca Ave., Ste. 100
Covina, Californj-a 91123
(626) 6s3-04ss
I'NTTED STATES DTSTRTCT COT'RT
CENTRJAI DISTRICT OF CALTFORNTA
tr
6
7
8
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, rNC.
9
10
02-Cv-02500-HLH (Ex)
a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff,
RENEI{AI OF DEFAULT iII'DGMENT
vs.
11
L2
13
t4
BY
CLERK
CLAUDIO MOYEDA individually
and dba EL RINCONCITO,
jointly and severally
Defendant
1,5
16
t7
Based upon
the Applicatj-on for
Renewal-
of Judgment of the
18
L9
20
22
23
riginal judgment, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 69 (a) and C.C.P.
39.11-0
through 683.320 and good cause appearing, therefore:
The default judgment entered on June 25, 2002 against
efendants,
CLAITDIO MOYEDA
individual.J.y and dba EL RINCONCITO,
24
25
zo
ointly and severallY is hereby renewed on the amounts set forth
low:
2'l
28
Page L
of
2
RENEWAL OF DEFAI,'LT .fI'DGMENT
Case No. 02-CX/-02500-HLH (Ex)
OF MONEY iII'DGMENT
a. Total- judgment
b. Costs after judgment
$5, 150 . o0
0. 00
0. 00
c. Attorney fees
d. Subtotal- (add a thru c)
Credits after,fudgment
I.
Subtotal (substract e from
g. Interest after judgment
h. Fee for filing renewal
i. Total. renewed judgrment
5,150.00
0.00
5,150.00
L,273.03
6
I
05/31/12
Clerk by
d)
0. 00
6,423.03
Lori Muraoka, Deputy Clerk
U.S. District Court
Page
2 of
2
RENEWAL OF DEfAt
Case
LT
,TITDGMENT
No. 02-CI/-02500-HLII
(Ex)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
