Carter v. Tucker, No. 5:2017cv05047 - Document 8 (W.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to follow the rules of the Court. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 16, 2017. (rg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carter v. Tucker Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION PLAINTIFF DILLON CARL CARTER v. Civil No. 5:17-CV-5047 DEPUTY NATE TUCKER, Benton County Detention Center DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER This is a civil rights case filed by the Plaintiff under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis and prose. At the times at issue in this case, Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Benton County Detention Center. To date, all mail sent by the Court to Plaintiff at the Benton County Detention Center has been returned as undeliverable (Doc. 6, 7) with a notation that he is no longer at that facility. Documents returned as undeliverable include: Complaint Referred (Doc. 1); Application to Proceed IFP (Doc. 2) ; Order Granting IFP and Directing Prisoner Payment (Doc. 3); Magistrate Notice/Consent Furnished (Doc. 4) ; and Clerk's Order re PLRA Initial Fee (Doc. 5). No new address is available for Plaintiff. Rule 5.5 (c)(2) of the Local Rules for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas requires a pro se party to keep the Court and opposing counsel informed of his current address. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to follow the rules of the Court. Fed . R. Civ. P 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED on this I t {~ ' day of May, 20 7. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
